Knowledge Marketplace
My First Million

My First Million

The best business ideas come from noticing what's working and doing it better, faster, or for a different audience.

Back to Takes

Private banking and wealth management services destroy rather than create value for most high-net-worth individuals

Spiciness
contrarian_take

The Reasoning

High fees (0.5-1.2% annually) compound over decades while adding minimal alpha over simple indexing. Behavioral psychology of percentage-based fees masks the true cost impact.

What Needs to Be True

  • Index funds continue delivering market returns
  • Wealth managers cannot consistently generate alpha above fees
  • Clients remain unaware of true fee impact over time
  • Status and convenience benefits don't justify costs

Counterargument

Wealth managers provide valuable behavioral coaching, tax planning, estate planning, and prevent costly emotional investment mistakes

What Would Change This View

Consistent evidence of alpha generation above fees, or demonstration of behavioral value exceeding fee drag

Implications for Builders

Build fee-transparent wealth management tools

Focus on flat-fee rather than AUM-based models

Create automated tax optimization services

Target education around fee impact awareness

Example Application

Goldman Sachs charged 1%+ fees and delivered 6% returns vs 13% from simple S&P indexing, resulting in millions less wealth over time.