My First Million
The best business ideas come from noticing what's working and doing it better, faster, or for a different audience.
There's a significant opportunity to build a frivolous lawsuit business targeting AI companies due to legal gray areas around copyright and intellectual property
The Reasoning
AI companies have raised significant funding, operate in legal gray areas around training data and intellectual property, and would prefer to settle quickly rather than fight lengthy legal battles that could impact fundraising
What Needs to Be True
- AI companies are vulnerable to IP and copyright claims
- Legal system allows broad interpretation of IP violations
- AI companies prioritize quick resolution over legal precedent
- Settlement amounts are economically attractive relative to legal costs
Counterargument
AI companies will fight these cases to set precedent, courts will dismiss frivolous cases quickly, and regulatory clarity will emerge reducing gray areas
What Would Change This View
Strong legal precedents protecting AI companies, quick dismissal of early cases, or regulatory clarity explicitly protecting AI training practices
Implications for Builders
AI companies should budget for legal defense
Consider IP clearing processes early in development
Build relationships with specialized AI legal counsel
Document training data sources and permissions
Example Application
“E-commerce companies routinely settle ADA compliance lawsuits for $10-20K rather than fight, even when claims are questionable, proving that well-funded companies will pay to avoid legal hassles”