My First Million
The best business ideas come from noticing what's working and doing it better, faster, or for a different audience.
The Blue Zones longevity research is largely fraudulent, based on age misreporting and poor record keeping rather than actual dietary or lifestyle factors
The Reasoning
Areas with highest reported longevity correlate with poorest record keeping and highest rates of age fraud, not with dietary patterns. People lie about being older to collect benefits or gain status.
What Needs to Be True
- Birth certificate accuracy is poor in Blue Zones regions
- Financial incentives exist for claiming older age
- Correlation between longevity claims and record-keeping quality
- Statistical anomalies in birth dates (like January 1st clustering)
Counterargument
Some dietary and lifestyle patterns in these regions may still contribute to health, even if extreme longevity claims are exaggerated
What Would Change This View
Rigorous analysis using only individuals with verified birth records showing similar longevity patterns
Implications for Builders
Be skeptical of health trends based on observational studies
Verify data quality before building products around health claims
Focus on mechanistic rather than correlational health research
Example Application
“Don't build a health supplement business around Blue Zones research without understanding the data quality issues underlying the claims.”