Knowledge Marketplace
My First Million

My First Million

The best business ideas come from noticing what's working and doing it better, faster, or for a different audience.

Back to Frameworks

Investment Thesis Litigation Framework

Reusability

A systematic approach to evaluating competing investment or business theories by collecting multiple expert perspectives and weighing evidence like a legal case.

How It Works

Identify 3-5 contrasting expert opinions on a topic, collect their evidence and reasoning, then evaluate which thesis has strongest logical foundation and supporting data.

Components

1

Identify 3-5 credible experts with different viewpoints

2

Document each person's core thesis and reasoning

3

Collect evidence each expert uses to support their position

4

Gut-check which thesis feels most logical to you

5

Stack-rank evidence quality across all theses

6

Make allocation decisions based on confidence levels

When to Use

When facing complex investment decisions, market uncertainty, or any situation where multiple credible experts disagree.

When Not to Use

For simple decisions with clear data, when time is extremely limited, or when you have deep personal expertise in the domain.

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

Cherry-picking evidence to support pre-existing biasGiving equal weight to all opinions regardless of expertiseMaking binary all-or-nothing decisionsIgnoring your intuitive response to different theses

Example

Evaluating economic outlook by comparing Ray Dalio's empire cycle thesis vs. dollar milkshake theory vs. Bitcoin maximalist position, weighing evidence for each, then allocating portfolio accordingly.